Author pitrou
Recipients Arach, Arfrever, Huzaifa.Sidhpurwala, Mark.Shannon, PaulMcMillan, Zhiping.Deng, alex, barry, benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, dmalcolm, eric.araujo, georg.brandl, gvanrossum, jcea, lemburg, pitrou, terry.reedy, v+python, vstinner
Date 2012-01-06.21:53:34
SpamBayes Score 0.0282076
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
> I'm in cautious agreement that collision counting is a better
> strategy.

Disagreed. Raising randomly is unacceptable (false positives), especially in a bugfix release.

> The dict implementation performance would suffer from
> randomization.

Benchmarks please. for example.
Date User Action Args
2012-01-06 21:53:35pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, lemburg, gvanrossum, barry, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, jcea, vstinner, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, Arfrever, v+python, alex, dmalcolm, Arach, Mark.Shannon, Zhiping.Deng, Huzaifa.Sidhpurwala, PaulMcMillan
2012-01-06 21:53:35pitrousetmessageid: <>
2012-01-06 21:53:34pitroulinkissue13703 messages
2012-01-06 21:53:34pitroucreate