Author lemburg
Recipients Arfrever, Huzaifa.Sidhpurwala, Mark.Shannon, PaulMcMillan, Zhiping.Deng, alex, barry, benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, dmalcolm, georg.brandl, gvanrossum, haypo, jcea, lemburg, merwok, pitrou, terry.reedy, v+python
Date 2012-01-06.17:03:08
SpamBayes Score 4.79271e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
STINNER Victor wrote:
> STINNER Victor <> added the comment:
> hash-attack.patch does never decrement the collision counter.

Why should it ? It's only used as local variable in the lookup function.

Note that the limit only triggers on a per-key basis. It's not
a limit on the total number of collisions in the table, so you don't
need to keep the number of collisions stored on the object.
Date User Action Args
2012-01-06 17:03:08lemburgsetrecipients: + lemburg, gvanrossum, barry, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, jcea, pitrou, haypo, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, merwok, Arfrever, v+python, alex, dmalcolm, Mark.Shannon, Zhiping.Deng, Huzaifa.Sidhpurwala, PaulMcMillan
2012-01-06 17:03:08lemburglinkissue13703 messages
2012-01-06 17:03:08lemburgcreate