Author terry.reedy
Recipients akira, benjamin.peterson, gz, pitrou, poolie, r.david.murray, terry.reedy, vila, vstinner
Date 2011-12-24.03:01:37
SpamBayes Score 4.34338e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1324695698.75.0.606403743311.issue13643@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Martin, after reading most all of the unusually large sequence of messages, I am closing this because three of the core developers with the most experience in this area are dead-set against your proposal. That does not make it 'wrong', but does mean that it will not be approved and implemented without new data and more persuasive arguments than those presented so far. I do not see that continued repetition of what has been said so far will change anything.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-12-24 03:01:39terry.reedysetrecipients: + terry.reedy, pitrou, vstinner, vila, benjamin.peterson, r.david.murray, gz, akira, poolie
2011-12-24 03:01:38terry.reedysetmessageid: <1324695698.75.0.606403743311.issue13643@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-12-24 03:01:38terry.reedylinkissue13643 messages
2011-12-24 03:01:37terry.reedycreate