Message149582
Is mro_internal's second call to type_mro_modified still needed? Its comment makes me suspect that it's not:
type_mro_modified(type, type->tp_mro);
/* corner case: the old-style super class might have been hidden
from the custom MRO */
type_mro_modified(type, type->tp_bases); |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-12-16 00:01:54 | pjenvey | set | recipients:
+ pjenvey, jcea, pitrou, flox, python-dev |
2011-12-16 00:01:54 | pjenvey | set | messageid: <1323993714.46.0.195083989531.issue13575@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-12-16 00:01:53 | pjenvey | link | issue13575 messages |
2011-12-16 00:01:53 | pjenvey | create | |
|