Message148267
Thanks for the fixed links amk. I think they can be fixed in the repo right now.
[Eli]
> I still think it's a bigger problem that the page discusses a module which
> is not available on Python 3.x - this means that a user following the page
> can't just type in the code and make it run.
It’s only one section that’s affected, so +1 to replacing its contents with just a link and short description (“the functional module does X and Y for Python 2”). Before doing that, would you have the time to contact its author and inquire about porting plans?
(BTW, the file is also inconsistent in its use of :: vs. implicit code blocks; I wonder if that affects doctest or the “hide prompts” button.) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-11-24 15:59:47 | eric.araujo | set | recipients:
+ eric.araujo, akuchling, rhettinger, ezio.melotti, eli.bendersky, docs@python |
2011-11-24 15:59:47 | eric.araujo | set | messageid: <1322150387.5.0.428766839273.issue13443@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-11-24 15:59:46 | eric.araujo | link | issue13443 messages |
2011-11-24 15:59:46 | eric.araujo | create | |
|