Message147670
> Me too. (Can you give the #ids of these other issues?)
See for example #13012.
> I think we should fix C functions to accept kwargs for the sake of
> Python programmers, not merely to ease documentation (that would just
> be a nice side-effect :)
And also for compatibility for other implementations like PyPy. I'm still not sure that is a good idea to do a mass conversion of all the functions though.
> Sphinx lets us give multiple signatures. I’ve just checked that this
> markup is valid and does not create duplicate index entries
This is something I was considering, but I'm afraid it might get too verbose (and introduce yet another convention). Sometimes this feature is also (mis?)used to group similar functions. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-11-15 14:15:32 | ezio.melotti | set | recipients:
+ ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, eric.smith, eric.araujo, eli.bendersky, docs@python, eric.snow, baptiste.carvello, petri.lehtinen |
2011-11-15 14:15:32 | ezio.melotti | set | messageid: <1321366532.24.0.684001648462.issue13386@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-11-15 14:15:31 | ezio.melotti | link | issue13386 messages |
2011-11-15 14:15:31 | ezio.melotti | create | |
|