Message147467
Hmm, I've just notice that this [default=val] pattern already exists in the 're' docs in 2.7, for example:
subn(repl, string[, count=0])
So my change was consistent within the documentation of this module.
No doubt, the conventions are currently a mess ;-)
I suggest to just convert the whole 're' RST page to the new 3.x convention (i.e. model it after the same RST in the default branch). Is this acceptable? If yes, I will submit a patch for review first. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-11-12 05:51:20 | eli.bendersky | set | recipients:
+ eli.bendersky, georg.brandl, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, docs@python, python-dev |
2011-11-12 05:51:20 | eli.bendersky | set | messageid: <1321077080.2.0.52173967055.issue12875@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-11-12 05:51:19 | eli.bendersky | link | issue12875 messages |
2011-11-12 05:51:19 | eli.bendersky | create | |
|