This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author eli.bendersky
Recipients amaury.forgeotdarc, docs@python, eli.bendersky, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, pitrou, python-dev
Date 2011-11-12.05:51:19
SpamBayes Score 0.00017764227
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1321077080.2.0.52173967055.issue12875@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Hmm, I've just notice that this [default=val] pattern already exists in the 're' docs in 2.7, for example:

  subn(repl, string[, count=0])

So my change was consistent within the documentation of this module.

No doubt, the conventions are currently a mess ;-)

I suggest to just convert the whole 're' RST page to the new 3.x convention (i.e. model it after the same RST in the default branch). Is this acceptable? If yes, I will submit a patch for review first.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-11-12 05:51:20eli.benderskysetrecipients: + eli.bendersky, georg.brandl, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, docs@python, python-dev
2011-11-12 05:51:20eli.benderskysetmessageid: <1321077080.2.0.52173967055.issue12875@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-11-12 05:51:19eli.benderskylinkissue12875 messages
2011-11-12 05:51:19eli.benderskycreate