This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author xdegaye
Recipients François-Xavier.Bourlet, giampaolo.rodola, josiahcarlson, neologix, stutzbach, xdegaye
Date 2011-11-03.20:08:44
SpamBayes Score 2.7556317e-07
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1320350925.26.0.646290297907.issue12498@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> I think the best would be to not handle POLLHUP events while POLLIN
> is set, so that the handlers can have a chance to drain the input
> socket buffer.

Ok.


> But it's a separate issue, could you create a new one?

The test case fails if the data has not been fully received by the
client. Do you mean that this new issue must be fixed first. Why a new
issue, after all this is the handling of a half-duplex disconnection
on the remote side ?
History
Date User Action Args
2011-11-03 20:08:45xdegayesetrecipients: + xdegaye, josiahcarlson, giampaolo.rodola, stutzbach, neologix, François-Xavier.Bourlet
2011-11-03 20:08:45xdegayesetmessageid: <1320350925.26.0.646290297907.issue12498@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-11-03 20:08:44xdegayelinkissue12498 messages
2011-11-03 20:08:44xdegayecreate