This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author petri.lehtinen
Recipients petri.lehtinen, pitrou, rpointel, vstinner
Date 2011-11-03.08:00:43
SpamBayes Score 3.851629e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1320307244.34.0.350203171567.issue13326@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
According to the man page, find -print0 and xargs -r are also GNU extensions. Even though they work on OpenBSD (do they?), they could still break on some platforms.

As find -exec cmd {} ';' is already used for everything but __pycache__, I'd rather only change the removal of __pycache__. I believe there are more files that match '*.py[co]' than '__pycache__', and people are already waiting for a separate rm process to be invoked on each *.py[co], so invoking a separate rmdir for each __pycache__ shouldn't make it much slower.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-11-03 08:00:44petri.lehtinensetrecipients: + petri.lehtinen, pitrou, vstinner, rpointel
2011-11-03 08:00:44petri.lehtinensetmessageid: <1320307244.34.0.350203171567.issue13326@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-11-03 08:00:43petri.lehtinenlinkissue13326 messages
2011-11-03 08:00:43petri.lehtinencreate