Author neologix
Recipients flox, neologix, petri.lehtinen, vilya, vstinner
Date 2011-11-02.19:30:48
SpamBayes Score 5.63864e-06
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
>> Could it return an opaque wrapper object, rather than just the raw
>> address? Something like:
> Are you suggesting that it would return either a Python function object or a
> wrapper object?

I think it would be an ugly kludge. I don't like the idea of passing
around an opaque "blob" just for that purpose (I mean, it's really a
corner case).
So I'm -1.
Date User Action Args
2011-11-02 19:30:49neologixsetrecipients: + neologix, vstinner, vilya, flox, petri.lehtinen
2011-11-02 19:30:48neologixlinkissue13285 messages
2011-11-02 19:30:48neologixcreate