➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author neologix
Recipients flox, neologix, petri.lehtinen, vilya, vstinner
Date 2011-11-02.19:30:48
SpamBayes Score 5.6386366e-06
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <CAH_1eM1aGyhWdK58n+LsfOJbTQ7S0A0HyZ6zGh1Jr5ww8LDFWw@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1320260423.37.0.651169011883.issue13285@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content 
>> Could it return an opaque wrapper object, rather than just the raw
>> address? Something like:
>
> Are you suggesting that it would return either a Python function object or a
> wrapper object?

I think it would be an ugly kludge. I don't like the idea of passing
around an opaque "blob" just for that purpose (I mean, it's really a
corner case).
So I'm -1.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-11-02 19:30:49neologixsetrecipients: + neologix, vstinner, vilya, flox, petri.lehtinen
2011-11-02 19:30:48neologixlinkissue13285 messages
2011-11-02 19:30:48neologixcreate