Message146742
> Note we only really see the effect if we make sure that gcc
> isn't emitting its "special" memcmp: that's why the -fno-builtin-memcmp
> is SO important on gcc builds!
I'd rather infer the opposite: given how GCC generates code, this patch
is not worthwhile. Given that it actually slows down Python in the
default system configuration, I'm -1 on applying it. This is really not
a route we should take; it leads to maintenance pain. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-10-31 20:49:34 | loewis | set | recipients:
+ loewis, pitrou, scoder, vstinner, asmodai, ezio.melotti, petri.lehtinen, RichIsMyName |
2011-10-31 20:49:33 | loewis | link | issue13279 messages |
2011-10-31 20:49:33 | loewis | create | |
|