Message 146352 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	barry, eric.araujo, janssen, nadeem.vawda, pitrou, vstinner
Date	2011-10-25.09:56:56
SpamBayes Score	1.3219102e-06
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1319536368.15328.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to	<1319498230.79.0.234450478002.issue13218@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
> It looks like it's been this way for a long time too. But tests have always passed here using OpenSSL 1.0.0. > It's probably too difficult, and not really Python's responsibility, > to determine whether SSL_OP_NO_SSLv2 is set. See http://docs.python.org/dev/library/ssl.html#ssl.SSLContext.options > Rather, I think the test is simply bogus and should be disabled or > removed. I think it would be good to keep a simplified/minimal (and, of course, working :-)) version of these tests. Patches welcome, anyway. I can't really test with Debian's OpenSSL.

> It looks like it's been this way for a long time too.

But tests have always passed here using OpenSSL 1.0.0.

> It's probably too difficult, and not really Python's responsibility,
> to determine whether SSL_OP_NO_SSLv2 is set.

See http://docs.python.org/dev/library/ssl.html#ssl.SSLContext.options

> Rather, I think the test is simply bogus and should be disabled or
> removed.

I think it would be good to keep a simplified/minimal (and, of course,
working :-)) version of these tests.
Patches welcome, anyway. I can't really test with Debian's OpenSSL.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2011-10-25 09:56:57	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, barry, janssen, vstinner, nadeem.vawda, eric.araujo
2011-10-25 09:56:56	pitrou	link	issue13218 messages
2011-10-25 09:56:56	pitrou	create