This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author roysmith
Recipients roysmith
Date 2011-10-23.18:32:38
SpamBayes Score 1.537924e-06
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1319394759.74.0.692830705102.issue13249@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
The docs list the arguments in the order:

class argparse.ArgumentParser([description][, epilog][, prog]...

but the code (I'm looking at the 2.7.2 source) lists them as:

 class ArgumentParser(_AttributeHolder, _ActionsContainer):
   [...]
   def __init__(self,
                 prog=None,
                 usage=None,
                 description=None,
                 [...]

If you create a parser with just:

parser = argparse.ArgumentParser("foo")

you end up setting the 'prog' argument instead of the expected 'description'.  

It's unclear if the order in the code should be fixed to match the docs, or the order in the docs fixed to match the code, or just a note added to the docs saying you should not rely on positional argument ordering and always create a parser with named arguments.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-10-23 18:32:39roysmithsetrecipients: + roysmith
2011-10-23 18:32:39roysmithsetmessageid: <1319394759.74.0.692830705102.issue13249@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-10-23 18:32:39roysmithlinkissue13249 messages
2011-10-23 18:32:38roysmithcreate