This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author oberstet
Recipients ezio.melotti, nailor, oberstet, orsenthil
Date 2011-10-22.21:18:32
SpamBayes Score 1.4974829e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1319318313.14.0.68314351713.issue13244@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I see how you interpret that sentence in the spec, but I would have read it differently:

invalid:

1. ws://example.com/something#somewhere
2. ws://example.com/something#somewhere/
3. ws://example.com/something#somewhere/foo
4. ws://example.com/something?query=foo#bar

valid:

5. ws://example.com/something%23somewhere
6. ws://example.com/something%23somewhere/
7. ws://example.com/something%23somewhere/foo
8. ws://example.com/something?query=foo%23bar

You would take 2. and 3. as valid, but 1. and 4. as invalid, right?
 
But you are right, the spec does not talk about # in path.

If above is a valid summary of the question, I'd better take that to the Hybi list to get feedback before rushing into anything with urllib ..
History
Date User Action Args
2011-10-22 21:18:33oberstetsetrecipients: + oberstet, orsenthil, ezio.melotti, nailor
2011-10-22 21:18:33oberstetsetmessageid: <1319318313.14.0.68314351713.issue13244@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-10-22 21:18:32oberstetlinkissue13244 messages
2011-10-22 21:18:32oberstetcreate