Author skrah
Recipients Alexander.Belopolsky, Arfrever, belopolsky, jcea, khenriksson, larry, lars.gustaebel, loewis, mark.dickinson, nadeem.vawda, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall, skrah, vstinner
Date 2011-09-29.17:47:07
SpamBayes Score 0.0046352
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
> BTW, what is the status of cdecimal?

I just wrote the same in another issue, but not everyone is subscribed
to that:

I think cdecimal is finished and production ready. The version in

is the same as what will be released as cdecimal-2.3 in a couple of
weeks. cdecimal-2.3 has a monumental test suite against *both* and decNumber. The test suite no longer finds any
kind of (unknown) divergence between, cdecimal and

Tests for cdecimal-2.3 have been running on 6 cores for more
than half a year.

In short, review would be highly welcome. ;)
Date User Action Args
2011-09-29 17:47:08skrahsetrecipients: + skrah, loewis, jcea, mark.dickinson, belopolsky, lars.gustaebel, vstinner, larry, nadeem.vawda, Arfrever, r.david.murray, Alexander.Belopolsky, rosslagerwall, khenriksson
2011-09-29 17:47:08skrahsetmessageid: <>
2011-09-29 17:47:07skrahlinkissue11457 messages
2011-09-29 17:47:07skrahcreate