Author terry.reedy
Recipients Arfrever, abacabadabacaba, ezio.melotti, gvanrossum, jkloth, lemburg, mrabarnett, pitrou, r.david.murray, tchrist, terry.reedy, v+python, vstinner
Date 2011-09-19.01:23:34
SpamBayes Score 0.000160963
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1316395415.93.0.0472611881591.issue12729@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
My long-ago memory is that 'should not' is slightly looser  in w3c parlance than 'must not'. However, it is a moot point if we decide to follow the 'should' in 3.3 for the default 'strict' mode, which both Ezio and I think we 'should' ;-). Our 'errors' parameter makes it easy to request something else, but it has to be explicit.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-09-19 01:23:36terry.reedysetrecipients: + terry.reedy, lemburg, gvanrossum, pitrou, vstinner, jkloth, ezio.melotti, mrabarnett, Arfrever, v+python, r.david.murray, abacabadabacaba, tchrist
2011-09-19 01:23:35terry.reedysetmessageid: <1316395415.93.0.0472611881591.issue12729@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-09-19 01:23:35terry.reedylinkissue12729 messages
2011-09-19 01:23:34terry.reedycreate