This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author ncoghlan
Recipients brandon-rhodes, brett.cannon, eric.araujo, eric.snow, ezio.melotti, ncoghlan, nedbat, sandro.tosi
Date 2011-09-06.05:32:15
SpamBayes Score 0.007422123
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1315287135.88.0.24393401595.issue11561@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Do we really want to enshrine shadowing the encodings module as the one true way to do this kind of thing?

Although I guess defining a way to do it properly would be a fairly major undertaking, so perhaps blessing the encodings hack is the practical way forward...

If we do that, I'd like to see a devguide patch that better explains how to generate your own coverage data for the stdlib with coverage.py, the encodings hack and the standard library coverage option.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-09-06 05:32:15ncoghlansetrecipients: + ncoghlan, brett.cannon, nedbat, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, sandro.tosi, brandon-rhodes, eric.snow
2011-09-06 05:32:15ncoghlansetmessageid: <1315287135.88.0.24393401595.issue11561@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-09-06 05:32:15ncoghlanlinkissue11561 messages
2011-09-06 05:32:15ncoghlancreate