Author ezio.melotti
Recipients akitada, akoumjian, alex, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, davide.rizzo, eric.snow, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith, jacques, jaylogan, jhalcrow, jimjjewett, loewis, mark, moreati, mrabarnett, nneonneo, pitrou, r.david.murray, ronnix, rsc, sjmachin, steven.daprano, stiv, timehorse, vbr, zdwiel
Date 2011-09-03.00:32:21
SpamBayes Score 0.00100019
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1315009941.95.0.932075875843.issue2636@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
If these are the only 3 non-backward compatible features and the nested set one is moved under the NEW flag, I guess the approach might work without having per-feature flags.

The "NEW" could be kept for compatibility for regex (if necessary), possibly aliasing it with VERSION1 or whatever name wins the bikeshed.

If you want to control that at import time, maybe a from __future__ import new_re_semantics could be used instead of a flag, but I'm not sure about that.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-09-03 00:32:22ezio.melottisetrecipients: + ezio.melotti, loewis, georg.brandl, gregory.p.smith, jimjjewett, sjmachin, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, pitrou, nneonneo, giampaolo.rodola, rsc, timehorse, mark, vbr, mrabarnett, jaylogan, akitada, moreati, steven.daprano, alex, r.david.murray, jacques, zdwiel, jhalcrow, stiv, davide.rizzo, ronnix, eric.snow, akoumjian
2011-09-03 00:32:21ezio.melottisetmessageid: <1315009941.95.0.932075875843.issue2636@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-09-03 00:32:21ezio.melottilinkissue2636 messages
2011-09-03 00:32:21ezio.melotticreate