This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author tchrist
Recipients Arfrever, belopolsky, daniel.urban, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, gvanrossum, mrabarnett, rhettinger, tchrist
Date 2011-08-26.22:28:43
SpamBayes Score 1.0528912e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <24872.1314397708@chthon>
In-reply-to <5347.1314397261@chthon>
Content
I should probably mention the importance in the design of a UCA module of
being able to specify which UCA version number you want it to behave like
in case you plan to override some of the DUCET entries.  That way if you
run under a later UCA with different DUCET weights, your own tailorings will
still make sense.  If you don't do this, your collation tailorings can break 
in a new release of the UCA.

--tom
History
Date User Action Args
2011-08-26 22:28:44tchristsetrecipients: + tchrist, gvanrossum, rhettinger, belopolsky, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, mrabarnett, Arfrever, daniel.urban
2011-08-26 22:28:43tchristlinkissue12735 messages
2011-08-26 22:28:43tchristcreate