This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author tchrist
Recipients Arfrever, belopolsky, daniel.urban, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, gvanrossum, mrabarnett, tchrist
Date 2011-08-26.21:51:47
SpamBayes Score 5.9682003e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <11583.1314395501@chthon>
In-reply-to <1314392809.06.0.51617717341.issue12735@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> Sounds like a fair feature request for Python 3.3, as long as the
> intention is that users must import some module from the standard
> library and use functions defined in that module.  The operations and
> methods defined for str instances (e.g. ==, <, etc.) should not change
> their behavior.

> Is there an existing 3rd party library that we could adopt (even if it isn't perfect yet)?

I *think* you could use ICU's.  

I'm pretty sure the Parrot people use ICU libraries.

--tom
History
Date User Action Args
2011-08-26 21:51:48tchristsetrecipients: + tchrist, gvanrossum, belopolsky, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, mrabarnett, Arfrever, daniel.urban
2011-08-26 21:51:47tchristlinkissue12735 messages
2011-08-26 21:51:47tchristcreate