Author barry
Recipients Arfrever, Ramchandra Apte, amaury.forgeotdarc, barry, djc, dmalcolm, doko, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, foom, gagern, jwilk, lemburg, loewis, neologix, petri.lehtinen, pitrou, python-dev, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall, sandro.tosi, vstinner
Date 2011-08-18.01:31:03
SpamBayes Score 6.0904e-09
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
On Aug 18, 2011, at 01:20 AM, James Y Knight wrote:

>James Y Knight <> added the comment:
>> I will backport the fix to 2.7 and 3.2.
>Uh, wait, so does that mean you're *not* going to do the
>compatibility-preserving thing and force sys.platform to stay linux2 even
>when python is built (BUILT! not run!) on a machine where the active kernel
>is linux 3.x?

My question too!  I would say that stable releases should probably not get
this change, but should force sys.platform to linux2 on 3.x kernels.

BTW, does anybody think sys.platform should use a more dynamic approach for
calculating its value?  Well, maybe not necessary if Python 3.3 will just say
Date User Action Args
2011-08-18 01:31:04barrysetrecipients: + barry, lemburg, loewis, doko, amaury.forgeotdarc, gagern, foom, pitrou, vstinner, jwilk, djc, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, Arfrever, r.david.murray, dmalcolm, sandro.tosi, neologix, rosslagerwall, python-dev, petri.lehtinen, Ramchandra Apte
2011-08-18 01:31:04barrylinkissue12326 messages
2011-08-18 01:31:03barrycreate