This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author barry
Recipients Arfrever, Ramchandra Apte, amaury.forgeotdarc, barry, djc, dmalcolm, doko, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, foom, gagern, jwilk, lemburg, loewis, neologix, petri.lehtinen, pitrou, python-dev, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall, sandro.tosi, vstinner
Date 2011-08-18.01:31:03
SpamBayes Score 6.0904e-09
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <20110817200658.7a9c7129@resist.wooz.org>
In-reply-to <1313630427.79.0.0198358341014.issue12326@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
On Aug 18, 2011, at 01:20 AM, James Y Knight wrote:

>James Y Knight <foom@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
>
>> I will backport the fix to 2.7 and 3.2.
>
>Uh, wait, so does that mean you're *not* going to do the
>compatibility-preserving thing and force sys.platform to stay linux2 even
>when python is built (BUILT! not run!) on a machine where the active kernel
>is linux 3.x?

My question too!  I would say that stable releases should probably not get
this change, but should force sys.platform to linux2 on 3.x kernels.

BTW, does anybody think sys.platform should use a more dynamic approach for
calculating its value?  Well, maybe not necessary if Python 3.3 will just say
'linux'.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-08-18 01:31:04barrysetrecipients: + barry, lemburg, loewis, doko, amaury.forgeotdarc, gagern, foom, pitrou, vstinner, jwilk, djc, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, Arfrever, r.david.murray, dmalcolm, sandro.tosi, neologix, rosslagerwall, python-dev, petri.lehtinen, Ramchandra Apte
2011-08-18 01:31:04barrylinkissue12326 messages
2011-08-18 01:31:03barrycreate