Author ezio.melotti
Recipients Rhamphoryncus, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, doerwalter, eric.smith, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, lemburg, loewis, pitrou, rhettinger, stutzbach, tchrist, vstinner
Date 2011-08-16.09:12:09
SpamBayes Score 1.48204e-06
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
I think the 4 macros:
are quite straightforward and can avoid using the trailing _.

Since I would like to see #9200 fixed on 3.2 (and possibly 2.7 too), would it be ok to:
 1) commit the patch with the trailing _ for all the macros on 3.2(/2.7);
 2) commit the patch with the trailing _ only for the _NEXT macros in 3.3;
 3) fix #9200 on all these branches using the new macros (with or without _);
 4) remove the trailing _ from the _NEXT macros in 3.4 if it turns out to work well;

> we will still have to deal with surrogates in codecs,
> which is where these macros will get used

They will also be used in many str methods and afaiu PEP 393 should address that.  I'm not sure it addresses codecs and builtin functions like chr() and ord() too.
Date User Action Args
2011-08-16 09:12:10ezio.melottisetrecipients: + ezio.melotti, lemburg, loewis, doerwalter, georg.brandl, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, Rhamphoryncus, pitrou, vstinner, eric.smith, stutzbach, tchrist
2011-08-16 09:12:10ezio.melottisetmessageid: <>
2011-08-16 09:12:10ezio.melottilinkissue10542 messages
2011-08-16 09:12:10ezio.melotticreate