Message141523
Updated patch attached.
>> Some notes:
>> - By doing things this way, we lose the ability to specify custom arguments to
>> the interpreter with $(TESTPYTHONOPTS). Might this be a problem?
>
> Yes, some buildbots use it. Can't you add support for it in the test runner?
Done.
> But test_concurrent_futures is not in the list for example.
Done.
Out of interest, I measured the running times of the different test targets:
quicktest 2m25s
test 3m55s
testall 8m30s
buildbottest 14m50s
(these are on a 3-year-old Core 2 Duo laptop) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-08-01 15:49:04 | nadeem.vawda | set | recipients:
+ nadeem.vawda, barry, brett.cannon, ncoghlan, pitrou, Arfrever, rosslagerwall, python-dev |
2011-08-01 15:49:04 | nadeem.vawda | set | messageid: <1312213744.32.0.0399921445801.issue11651@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-08-01 15:49:03 | nadeem.vawda | link | issue11651 messages |
2011-08-01 15:49:03 | nadeem.vawda | create | |
|