Message141442
2011/7/30 Charles-François Natali <report@bugs.python.org>:
>
> Charles-François Natali <neologix@free.fr> added the comment:
>
>> I actually implemented this because I wanted to confine a Python process to a cpu to prevent keep it from being tossed from core to core. It made sense to bring the other scheduling functions along for the ride.
>
> Why didn't you use something like:
>
> $ taskset <cpu mask> python myscript.py
Because I didn't want to type that every time I ran the script.
>
> By the way, binding a multi-threaded Python process to a single core
> is often a simple way to improve performance, because with the GIL the
> threads are actually serialized, so you have almost no contention, and
> your threads get hot cache.
Indeed, that's what I was doing. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-07-30 14:15:17 | benjamin.peterson | set | recipients:
+ benjamin.peterson, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, neologix, rosslagerwall |
2011-07-30 14:15:17 | benjamin.peterson | link | issue12655 messages |
2011-07-30 14:15:16 | benjamin.peterson | create | |
|