Author benjamin.peterson
Recipients amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson, pitrou
Date 2011-07-29.17:50:15
SpamBayes Score 5.60724e-06
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <CAPZV6o-XOj=mLj1tkGP+RSu8z3O_Op4X9YYtvSu+yq6H7hgNQw@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1311961736.02.0.799419852457.issue12655@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
2011/7/29 Amaury Forgeot d'Arc <report@bugs.python.org>:
>
> Amaury Forgeot d'Arc <amauryfa@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
>> @@ -10330,26 +10899,34 @@ INITFUNC(void)
> I know that it's only an increase of 5%, but I feel that posixmodule.c is already large enough.
> Does this feature belongs to the os module?
> Or is it time to split posixmodule.c in several pieces?

I completely agree with you, but that's a separate issue.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-07-29 17:50:16benjamin.petersonsetrecipients: + benjamin.peterson, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou
2011-07-29 17:50:15benjamin.petersonlinkissue12655 messages
2011-07-29 17:50:15benjamin.petersoncreate