Author jaraco
Recipients eric.araujo, jaraco, orsenthil, python-dev
Date 2011-07-27.16:16:28
SpamBayes Score 2.37602e-06
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <A2A66F57550F50449EC38E10458E27FF1314F058D9@VA3DIAXVS381.RED001.local>
In-reply-to <>
> Instead of writing a new class, what about using instead of the
> builtin?  Then you’ll be able to use the same patch than 3.2.

Ooh. Excellent suggestion.
Date User Action Args
2011-07-27 16:16:29jaracosetrecipients: + jaraco, orsenthil, eric.araujo, python-dev
2011-07-27 16:16:28jaracolinkissue10639 messages
2011-07-27 16:16:28jaracocreate