Author cool-RR
Recipients benjamin.peterson, cool-RR, cvrebert, eric.araujo, ganadist, giampaolo.rodola, rosslagerwall
Date 2011-07-13.16:23:39
SpamBayes Score 0.000326642
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1310574220.27.0.826758939725.issue3177@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Eric, I have no problem with this function being placed in `shutil` instead of `os`, as long as it's implemented and it's in the standard library, and people don't have to use subprocess to run open or xdg-open themselves as I currently do.

So I have no problem with renaming this bug to "Add shutil.open".
History
Date User Action Args
2011-07-13 16:23:40cool-RRsetrecipients: + cool-RR, giampaolo.rodola, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, ganadist, cvrebert, rosslagerwall
2011-07-13 16:23:40cool-RRsetmessageid: <1310574220.27.0.826758939725.issue3177@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-07-13 16:23:39cool-RRlinkissue3177 messages
2011-07-13 16:23:39cool-RRcreate