Message140078
OK, I found the other issue and it looks like we agreed to use 'attributes and methods' where the reference was inclusive. I still think that it is less precise to think this way, but it is clearer exposition given the lack of a good term for non-method attributes. So now I agree that we should not change the existing glossary definition of attribute. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-07-10 12:54:05 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, rhettinger, orsenthil, docs@python, eric.snow |
2011-07-10 12:54:05 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1310302445.28.0.814815647002.issue12491@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-07-10 12:54:04 | r.david.murray | link | issue12491 messages |
2011-07-10 12:54:04 | r.david.murray | create | |
|