Author pitrou
Recipients Arfrever, amaury.forgeotdarc, doko, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, jwilk, lemburg, loewis, neologix, petri.lehtinen, pitrou, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall, vstinner
Date 2011-07-09.13:29:27
SpamBayes Score 0.000137344
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1310218112.3677.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <>
> while this is sorted out, I propose to apply the following workaround
> not to introduce `linux3', at least for the branches:

It's too late, since existing versions won't have the patch and will
show "linux3" when the kernel gets upgraded.

I think we'd better bite the bullet and accept the "linux3" value.
Date User Action Args
2011-07-09 13:29:28pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, lemburg, loewis, doko, amaury.forgeotdarc, vstinner, jwilk, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, Arfrever, r.david.murray, neologix, rosslagerwall, petri.lehtinen
2011-07-09 13:29:28pitroulinkissue12326 messages
2011-07-09 13:29:27pitroucreate