Author jonas.wagner
Recipients MHordecki, efosmark, eric.araujo, flox, jonas.wagner, milesck, quentel, r.david.murray, taleinat, vstinner
Date 2011-07-04.11:26:34
SpamBayes Score 1.112e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
Hi Tal,

Thanks a lot for your feedback.

My primary objective was to increase the test coverage for If it is a problem to have the additional tests in this patch I'm happy to create a new issue with a separate patch. 

The default value for the boundary was an oversight, sorry for that.

You are right regarding the commented out boundary as well, I forgot to refresh the patch. Again, sorry.

Do you think valid_boundary should contain a check to ensure it is a byte object?
Date User Action Args
2011-07-04 11:26:35jonas.wagnersetrecipients: + jonas.wagner, vstinner, taleinat, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, efosmark, milesck, MHordecki, flox, quentel
2011-07-04 11:26:35jonas.wagnersetmessageid: <>
2011-07-04 11:26:35jonas.wagnerlinkissue12411 messages
2011-07-04 11:26:35jonas.wagnercreate