This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author sleepycal
Recipients Cal.Leeming, orsenthil, r.david.murray, santoso.wijaya, sleepycal
Date 2011-07-01.13:21:37
SpamBayes Score 4.650533e-09
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <BANLkTi=ZrVhpPa7O3-GhfXZcJ2kDJV=x_g@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1309506344.21.0.315862172375.issue12455@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
Thats full understandable that the default won't change. I'll put this in my
todo list to write a patch in a week or two.
On 1 Jul 2011 08:45, "R. David Murray" <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> R. David Murray <rdmurray@bitdance.com> added the comment:
>
> Quoting http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2068#section-4.2:
>
> Field names are case-insensitive.
>
> Which is only logical, since they are modeled on email headers, and email
header names are case insensitive. So, the server in question is broken,
yes, but that doesn't mean we can't provide a facility to allow Python to
inter-operate with it. Email, for example, preserves the case of the field
names it parses or receives from the application program, but otherwise
treats them case-insensitively. However, since the current code coerces to
title case, we have to provide this feature as a switchable facility
defaulting to the current behavior, for backward compatibility reasons.
>
> And someone needs to write a patch....
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12455>
> _______________________________________
Files
File name Uploaded
unnamed sleepycal, 2011-07-01.13:21:37
History
Date User Action Args
2011-07-01 13:21:38sleepycalsetrecipients: + orsenthil, r.david.murray, santoso.wijaya, Cal.Leeming
2011-07-01 13:21:37sleepycallinkissue12455 messages
2011-07-01 13:21:37sleepycalcreate