Author pitrou
Recipients Giovanni.Bajo, avian, bobbyi, gregory.p.smith, neologix, nirai, pitrou, sdaoden, vstinner
Date 2011-06-30.19:14:14
SpamBayes Score 0.00120113
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1309461214.3214.9.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <20110630190521.GA41324@sherwood.local>
Content
> I would add a big fat note that multiprocessing.Process should be
> used instead today, because how about those of us who are not
> sophisticated enough to be appointed to standard committees?

How do you think multiprocessing.Process launches a new process?
History
Date User Action Args
2011-06-30 19:14:15pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, gregory.p.smith, vstinner, nirai, bobbyi, neologix, Giovanni.Bajo, sdaoden, avian
2011-06-30 19:14:14pitroulinkissue6721 messages
2011-06-30 19:14:14pitroucreate