This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author r.david.murray
Recipients daniel.urban, docs@python, eric.araujo, ncoghlan, r.david.murray, terry.reedy
Date 2011-06-25.05:11:46
SpamBayes Score 2.1702445e-10
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1308978707.12.0.0404889796885.issue12374@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
My understanding is that the language reference is a purposefully minimalist document that specifies the language (insofar as anything other than the CPython implementation does so).  So while better explanations of the implications of the language design are a good thing, they don't necessarily belong in the language reference.  (I'm not saying they don't, I'm just repeating what the intro says: "this is not a tutorial".)  In particular I am suspicious that statements that begin "in languages such as ..." don't belong in the language reference as it is currently written.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-06-25 05:11:47r.david.murraysetrecipients: + r.david.murray, terry.reedy, ncoghlan, eric.araujo, daniel.urban, docs@python
2011-06-25 05:11:47r.david.murraysetmessageid: <1308978707.12.0.0404889796885.issue12374@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-06-25 05:11:46r.david.murraylinkissue12374 messages
2011-06-25 05:11:46r.david.murraycreate