Author r.david.murray
Recipients BreamoreBoy, akuchling, bwmcadams, cjw296, dieresys, georg.brandl, jjlee, kristjan.jonsson, orsenthil, r.david.murray, santoso.wijaya
Date 2011-06-23.15:46:39
SpamBayes Score 5.31569e-06
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1308844000.62.0.879560073272.issue2202@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
3.3.

IMO this is in the grey area between feature and bug fix.  I think it is possible to argue that it can be treated as a bug fix, but I think we need opinions from other developers if we want to try to go that route.

The reason I think it can be argued that it can be treated as a bug fix is that (if I understand correctly) there is no difference in the application code.  The only difference is whether or not one can successfully communicate with IIS 6.  That may not be a sufficient argument, but it is an argument :)
History
Date User Action Args
2011-06-23 15:46:40r.david.murraysetrecipients: + r.david.murray, akuchling, georg.brandl, jjlee, orsenthil, kristjan.jonsson, cjw296, bwmcadams, dieresys, santoso.wijaya, BreamoreBoy
2011-06-23 15:46:40r.david.murraysetmessageid: <1308844000.62.0.879560073272.issue2202@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-06-23 15:46:40r.david.murraylinkissue2202 messages
2011-06-23 15:46:39r.david.murraycreate