Message138085
> OK, I'll test it too.
Thanks. In case you’re not sure how to test my patch, see http://docs.python.org/devguide/faq#how-do-i-apply-a-patch and http://docs.python.org/devguide/runtests
> I looked sources of packaging. That use packaging.utils.copy_tree.
> When I reported that problem, install_scripts used backport.shutil.copytree.
Ah, I see a comment in the code that copy_tree should be replaced by shutil.copytree, so we need to get the test anyway to make sure changing the code later will not cause a regression.
> Maybe problem is fixed, because it reterned copied file lists.
Indeed.
> Is that fixies applied to distutils2?
distutils2 will be recreated as a backport of packaging. IOW, the packaging module in the 3.3 stdlib is the distutils2 project. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-06-10 15:43:46 | eric.araujo | set | recipients:
+ eric.araujo, tarek, Atsushi.Odagiri |
2011-06-10 15:43:46 | eric.araujo | set | messageid: <1307720626.29.0.142850667644.issue10191@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-06-10 15:43:45 | eric.araujo | link | issue10191 messages |
2011-06-10 15:43:45 | eric.araujo | create | |
|