Message137946
(I should not answer in this issue, but in #8407)
> > See also issue #8407 for sigtimedwait() and signalfd() in Python.
>
> You didn't commit the signalfd part?
Not yet because I would like to provide something to decode the data written into the signalfd file descriptor (msg135438), the signalfd_siginfo structure.
> Whay do you think of sigtimedwait?
It would like to expose it (msg137071, you should read sigtimedwait, not sigwaitinfo :-)). I started to work on a patch, but it requires a siginfo_t structure, and I didn't finish my patch. I will retry later.
> Expose it as-is, or just add an optional timeout option to sigwait?
I prefer thin wrappers: sigwaitinfo() is more than just a timeout argument, there is also the signal info argument. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-06-09 10:37:19 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, neologix |
2011-06-09 10:37:19 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1307615839.65.0.611175997001.issue12187@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-06-09 10:37:19 | vstinner | link | issue12187 messages |
2011-06-09 10:37:19 | vstinner | create | |
|