This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients docs@python, eli.bendersky, eric.smith, ezio.melotti, gvanrossum, pitrou, terry.reedy, vstinner
Date 2011-06-07.12:02:52
SpamBayes Score 0.00815148
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1307448169.3530.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <>
> If there are a few of these idioms, I'm not against adding a new
> section  to PEP 7 (something like the "Programming Recommendations"
> section in the PEP 8).  It's just not worth doing it for the "*p++ =
> x;" idiom alone IMHO.

If these are recommandations, perhaps we should put them in the devguide

But I agree that it's not worth doing it only for "*p++" anyway.
Date User Action Args
2011-06-07 12:02:53pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, gvanrossum, terry.reedy, vstinner, eric.smith, ezio.melotti, eli.bendersky, docs@python
2011-06-07 12:02:52pitroulinkissue12188 messages
2011-06-07 12:02:52pitroucreate