Message 137707 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	poq
Recipients	docs@python, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, pitrou, poq, rhettinger, terry.reedy
Date	2011-06-05.18:38:40
SpamBayes Score	4.281168e-07
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1307299121.07.0.0500894684233.issue12134@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
dump() is not slower because it's incremental though. It's slower because it's pure Python. I don't think there is necessarily a memory/speed trade-off; it should be possible to write an incremental encoder in C as well.

dump() is not slower because it's incremental though. It's slower because it's pure Python. I don't think there is necessarily a memory/speed trade-off; it should be possible to write an incremental encoder in C as well.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2011-06-05 18:38:41	poq	set	recipients: + poq, rhettinger, terry.reedy, pitrou, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, docs@python
2011-06-05 18:38:41	poq	set	messageid: <1307299121.07.0.0500894684233.issue12134@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-06-05 18:38:40	poq	link	issue12134 messages
2011-06-05 18:38:40	poq	create