Author techtonik
Recipients Arfrever, alexis, barry, eric.araujo, loewis, skrah, tarek, techtonik
Date 2011-06-01.15:14:59
SpamBayes Score 8.98781e-13
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <BANLkTi=sQ9qDPibkXJiqxEmkaTNKMKaq8w@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1306926375.33.0.744842539574.issue12226@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Barry A. Warsaw <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Barry A. Warsaw <barry@python.org> added the comment:
>
> Given that 2.6.7 is rc2 with a final release scheduled in 2 days, I don't want to apply this to 2.6 right now.  Can you guarantee this won't regress for anybody?  If so, then I'm also +0 for 2.6 after the 2.6.7 release.

Adding catalog-sig to CC. I can guarantee this for Windows. I'll be
near Linux box tomorrow and will try upload to PyPI from there. It
still will be more authoritative if more than one person can test
upload to PyPI with this patch on different systems.
--
anatoly t.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-06-01 15:15:00techtoniksetrecipients: + techtonik, loewis, barry, tarek, eric.araujo, Arfrever, skrah, alexis
2011-06-01 15:14:59techtoniklinkissue12226 messages
2011-06-01 15:14:59techtonikcreate