This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author r.david.murray
Recipients bethard, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, maker, r.david.murray
Date 2011-05-26.16:49:43
SpamBayes Score 6.291338e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1306428584.71.0.870020254372.issue10424@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I would remove the docstring from the new test class...if more tests of message content are added that docstring won't be accurate.  It really isn't needed.  (Also, shouldn't the test method be named test_missingarguments?)

I would also like to see a test where there are optional non-option arguments (nargs='?'), where you test that the optional one does *not* appear in the message.  That'll give you a second test method, making that test class a *little* less trivial :)
History
Date User Action Args
2011-05-26 16:49:44r.david.murraysetrecipients: + r.david.murray, bethard, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, maker
2011-05-26 16:49:44r.david.murraysetmessageid: <1306428584.71.0.870020254372.issue10424@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-05-26 16:49:43r.david.murraylinkissue10424 messages
2011-05-26 16:49:43r.david.murraycreate