This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author neologix
Recipients neologix, pitrou, ryan003, victorpoluceno, vstinner
Date 2011-05-23.12:14:21
SpamBayes Score 4.221379e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1306152862.21.0.798153120568.issue5715@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> Oh, Linux 2.6.27+ has a SOCK_CLOEXEC option:

It's not exactly the same thing.
We want to close the socket right after fork, not wait until exec (in the OP case there was no exec).

> Patch looks fine to me. Is it easily testable?

Easily, no.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-05-23 12:14:22neologixsetrecipients: + neologix, pitrou, vstinner, ryan003, victorpoluceno
2011-05-23 12:14:22neologixsetmessageid: <1306152862.21.0.798153120568.issue5715@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-05-23 12:14:21neologixlinkissue5715 messages
2011-05-23 12:14:21neologixcreate