This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients alexey-smirnov, amaury.forgeotdarc, georg.brandl, neologix, petri.lehtinen, pitrou, python-dev, socketpair, vstinner
Date 2011-05-22.20:25:23
SpamBayes Score 0.0012920618
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1306095916.3535.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <1306095543.3801.2.camel@marge>
Content
> Python doesn't suppose atomic open+CLOEXEC anymore, I consider this as a
> regression from Python 2 (which support open("re") with the GNU libc).

It has never been documented (nor supported) so, no, I wouldn't consider
it a regression.

> But... it tooks some years until someone noticed this regression.

Which means it's certainly unimportant.

> Can we add new features to old releases?

Well, you already know the answer, don't you? :)
History
Date User Action Args
2011-05-22 20:25:24pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, georg.brandl, amaury.forgeotdarc, vstinner, neologix, socketpair, python-dev, petri.lehtinen, alexey-smirnov
2011-05-22 20:25:23pitroulinkissue12105 messages
2011-05-22 20:25:23pitroucreate