This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author mark.dickinson
Recipients alex, belopolsky, daniel.urban, mark.dickinson, rhettinger
Date 2011-05-21.19:48:17
SpamBayes Score 5.39735e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
> What is the reason to make them quiet for floats other
> than backward compatibility?

For me, none.  I'll happily agree that, all other things being equal, it's more natural (and more consistent with other languages) to have < correspond to the signaling operation, and in a new language that's probably what I'd go for.  But as a *change* to existing behaviour in a language that's been widely adopted for numerical work, the risk of breakage seems to me to outweigh any benefits.
Date User Action Args
2011-05-21 19:48:18mark.dickinsonsetrecipients: + mark.dickinson, rhettinger, belopolsky, alex, daniel.urban
2011-05-21 19:48:17mark.dickinsonsetmessageid: <>
2011-05-21 19:48:17mark.dickinsonlinkissue11949 messages
2011-05-21 19:48:17mark.dickinsoncreate