Message135843
I've updated the 3.x patch, should be correct now.
I also updated the 2.x patch to use ``in``. :keyword:`in` was used in an earlier part of the paragraph I modified, so I have changed both for consistency.
This is the paragraph before modification:
"
In all cases, if the optional parts are omitted, the code is executed in the
current scope. If only the first expression after :keyword:`in` is specified,
it should be a dictionary, which will be used for both the global and the local
variables. If two expressions are given, they are used for the global and local
variables, respectively. If provided, *locals* can be any mapping object.
" |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-05-12 16:04:31 | jstadler | set | recipients:
+ jstadler, terry.reedy, ncoghlan, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, docs@python |
2011-05-12 16:04:31 | jstadler | set | messageid: <1305216271.36.0.717786267185.issue8824@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-05-12 16:04:30 | jstadler | link | issue8824 messages |
2011-05-12 16:04:30 | jstadler | create | |
|