Message135655
Steffen, you changed the default to doing a "full sync" in your last patch: while I was favoring that initially, I now agree with Ronald and Antoine, and think that we shouldn't change the default behaviour. The reason being that Apple and NetBSD folks should know what they're doing, and that there might be some subtle side effects (see for example my comment on sync_file_range on Linux). Also, given how many bugs you seem to encouter on OS-X, it's probably better to stick to a syscall known to be safe instead of silently replacing it by a maybe-not-so-tested syscall. Finally, depending on the workload, it could have a significant performance impact. People requiring write durability will probably manage to find this full_sync parameter. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-05-09 21:36:34 | neologix | set | recipients:
+ neologix, ronaldoussoren, pitrou, vstinner, nadeem.vawda, santoso.wijaya, sdaoden |
2011-05-09 21:36:34 | neologix | set | messageid: <1304976994.14.0.502934856435.issue11877@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-05-09 21:36:32 | neologix | link | issue11877 messages |
2011-05-09 21:36:32 | neologix | create | |
|