Author pitrou
Recipients Albert.Strasheim, aljungberg, asksol, bquinlan, gdb, gkcn, hongqn, jnoller, pitrou, vlasovskikh, vstinner
Date 2011-05-03.09:04:02
SpamBayes Score 0.00637351
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1304413443.37.0.35717273919.issue9205@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Actually, it came to me that if a child process exists, the queues are not guaranteed to be a consistent state anymore (the child could have terminated in the middle of a partial read or write). So it may be better to simply declare the ProcessPoolExecutor terminally broken when one of its children have exited.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-05-03 09:04:03pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, bquinlan, vstinner, jnoller, hongqn, asksol, vlasovskikh, gdb, Albert.Strasheim, aljungberg, gkcn
2011-05-03 09:04:03pitrousetmessageid: <1304413443.37.0.35717273919.issue9205@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-05-03 09:04:02pitroulinkissue9205 messages
2011-05-03 09:04:02pitroucreate