Author tarek
Recipients Denis.Barmenkov, bbi5291, eric.araujo, ned.deily, neologix, tarek, vstinner, xuanji
Date 2011-05-02.15:43:19
SpamBayes Score 4.59495e-08
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1304351000.02.0.819210968036.issue10496@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
As discussed w/ Victor, a process should be able to run Python even if its user does not have a home.

So the call to _getuserbase() should be protected. 

But then we have to control that all the code that uses  CONFIG_VARS['userbase'] is protected when the value is not set.

I am thinking about per-user installation and such things: we need to make sure everything is checking this.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-05-02 15:43:20tareksetrecipients: + tarek, vstinner, ned.deily, eric.araujo, neologix, xuanji, bbi5291, Denis.Barmenkov
2011-05-02 15:43:20tareksetmessageid: <1304351000.02.0.819210968036.issue10496@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-05-02 15:43:19tareklinkissue10496 messages
2011-05-02 15:43:19tarekcreate