Message134380
> The MALLOC_MMAP_THRESHOLD improvement is less visible here:
>
Are you running on 64-bit ?
If yes, it could be that you're exhausting M_MMAP_MAX (malloc falls
back to brk when there are too many mmap mappings).
You could try with
MALLOC_MMAP_THRESHOLD_=1024 MALLOC_MMAP_MAX_=16777216 ../opt/python
issue11849_test.py
By the way, never do that in real life, it's a CPU and memory hog ;-)
I think the root cause is that glibc's malloc coalescing of free
chunks is called far less often than in the original ptmalloc version,
but I still have to dig some more.
>> By the way, I noticed that dictionnaries are never allocated through
>> pymalloc, since a new dictionnary takes more than 256B...
>
> On 64-bit builds indeed. pymalloc could be improved to handle allocations up
> to 512B. Want to try and write a patch?
Sure.
I'll open another issue. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-04-25 12:36:06 | neologix | set | recipients:
+ neologix, pitrou, flox, kaifeng |
2011-04-25 12:36:05 | neologix | link | issue11849 messages |
2011-04-25 12:36:04 | neologix | create | |
|