Message133854
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Marc-Andre Lemburg
<report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>..
> Why don't you use the standard literal escapes for the examples
> and annotate the code points with the code point names ?
A am neutral on how to enter unicode characters in source reST. In
the previous discussions most people seemed to prefer WISIWYG. If
literal escapes solved the PDF issue, I would use it even at the
expense of loosing testability of the output displays.
Code point names as usually very long for exotic characters that
illustrate UCD features. I like presenting them, but in tables I'd
rather present more examples and still keep column width reasonable. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-04-15 17:25:01 | belopolsky | set | recipients:
+ belopolsky, lemburg, loewis, georg.brandl, vstinner, ezio.melotti, docs@python |
2011-04-15 17:25:00 | belopolsky | link | issue10665 messages |
2011-04-15 17:25:00 | belopolsky | create | |
|