Author benjamin.peterson
Recipients arnoldp, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, gruszczy, mark.dickinson
Date 2011-04-14.13:15:39
SpamBayes Score 1.73329e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <BANLkTikzo9u5XvmLKjWNO05vS_xhDF7dGQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1302786716.5.0.611590215693.issue9544@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
2011/4/14 Filip GruszczyƄski <report@bugs.python.org>:
>
> Filip GruszczyƄski <gruszczy@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> I am well aware of this, Benjamin. I am not trying to force any solution, but rather trying to point out, that current documentation is misleading. There might be no need for patching the code, but rather updating the docs to say, that only bytes are allowed and that will be sufficient.

Yes, I think a doc patch is the correct thing to do.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-04-14 13:15:39benjamin.petersonsetrecipients: + benjamin.peterson, mark.dickinson, eric.araujo, gruszczy, arnoldp
2011-04-14 13:15:39benjamin.petersonlinkissue9544 messages
2011-04-14 13:15:39benjamin.petersoncreate